Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(40): add precision_halves customization #248

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 28, 2024

Conversation

caibinqing
Copy link
Collaborator

@caibinqing caibinqing commented Jul 26, 2024

copied from E3

georgezhao2010/midea_ac_lan#152

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new method to customize precision for temperature settings.
    • Added a property to access the precision half setting easily.
  • Enhancements
    • Improved temperature data processing based on the new precision setting for better configurability.
    • Expanded test coverage with new unit tests for the MideaX40Device class to ensure reliability and functionality.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the MideaX40Device class enhance its functionality by adding a precision setting for temperature management. A new private attribute, _precision_halves, allows users to customize how temperature data is processed. The class now includes methods to set this precision and access its state, improving configurability and control over temperature handling for a better user experience.

Changes

Files Change Summary
midealocal/devices/x40/__init__.py Introduced _precision_halves attribute and set_customize method. Modified process_message to adjust temperature based on _precision_halves. Added precision_halves property for state access.
tests/devices/x40/__init__.py Added module-level docstring for test suite of "Midea local 40 device."
tests/devices/x40/device_x40_test.py Created unit tests for MideaX40Device, focusing on set_customize method and temperature adjustments. Structured using pytest.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant MideaX40Device
    participant TemperatureData

    User->>MideaX40Device: set_customize(customize)
    MideaX40Device->>MideaX40Device: Parse JSON for precision_halves
    MideaX40Device->>TemperatureData: process_message()
    TemperatureData->>MideaX40Device: Get current_temperature
    MideaX40Device->>MideaX40Device: Adjust temperature if precision_halves is True
    MideaX40Device->>TemperatureData: Store adjusted temperature
Loading

Poem

In the burrow where bunnies dwell,
A change has come, and all is well.
With precision set, the temps align,
Oh, how they dance, like stars that shine!
A hop, a skip, a joyful cheer,
For Midea’s magic brings us near! 🐰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 536f975 and 525c4ed.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • midealocal/devices/x40/init.py (5 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
midealocal/devices/x40/__init__.py (5)

3-3: LGTM!

The import statements are appropriate for the new feature implementation.


75-78: LGTM!

The precision_halves property is implemented correctly.


156-167: LGTM!

The set_customize method is implemented correctly with proper error handling and logging.


112-116: LGTM! But verify the correctness of the temperature adjustment logic.

The changes to the process_message method are appropriate and necessary for the new feature.

However, ensure that the temperature adjustment logic is correct.

Verification successful

Verified: The temperature adjustment logic in the process_message method is correct.

The condition and the adjustment logic for the current_temperature based on the _precision_halves setting are implemented correctly.

  • File: midealocal/devices/x40/__init__.py
  • Lines: 112-116
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of the temperature adjustment logic.

# Test: Search for the usage of the `process_message` method. Expect: Correct temperature adjustment logic.
rg --type python -A 5 $'process_message'

Length of output: 70


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of the temperature adjustment logic.

# Test: Search for the usage of the `process_message` method. Expect: Correct temperature adjustment logic.
rg -A 10 'def process_message' 

Length of output: 31481


Line range hint 47-74:
LGTM! But verify the usage of the customize parameter in the codebase.

The changes to the __init__ method are appropriate and necessary for the new feature.

However, ensure that the customize parameter is used correctly throughout the codebase.

Verification successful

LGTM! The customize parameter is used correctly throughout the codebase.

The customize parameter is consistently implemented and tested across various device initialization files and test cases. The set_customize method is used to handle the customization logic appropriately.

  • midealocal/devices/x40/__init__.py: The customize parameter is passed to the set_customize method.
  • Multiple test files (e.g., tests/devices/c3/device_c3_test.py, tests/devices/ac/device_ac_test.py) include tests for the customize parameter.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `customize` parameter in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of the `customize` parameter. Expect: Correct usage in the codebase.
rg --type python -A 5 $'customize'

Length of output: 64


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `customize` parameter in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of the `customize` parameter. Expect: Correct usage in the codebase.
rg --type py -A 5 $'customize'

Length of output: 37495

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 26, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 35.34%. Comparing base (536f975) to head (ff7f2bb).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #248      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   34.23%   35.34%   +1.10%     
==========================================
  Files          81       81              
  Lines        7165     7184      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits         2453     2539      +86     
+ Misses       4712     4645      -67     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@caibinqing caibinqing added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@rokam rokam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Please add the tests for what was changed.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
tests/devices/x40/device_x40_test.py (1)

31-51: Consider adding more assertions and edge cases.

The test_customize method is correctly testing the precision_halves customization. However, consider adding more assertions to cover edge cases and ensure completeness.

+        # Test with precision_halves set to false
+        self.device.set_customize('{"precision_halves": false}')
+        assert self.device.precision_halves is False
+        mock_message.current_temperature = 53
+        new_status = self.device.process_message(b"")
+        assert new_status[DeviceAttributes.current_temperature] == 53

+        # Test with invalid JSON
+        with pytest.raises(ValueError):
+            self.device.set_customize('{"precision_halves": "invalid"}')
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 525c4ed and e2e5704.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • tests/devices/x40/init.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/devices/x40/device_x40_test.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • tests/devices/x40/init.py
Additional comments not posted (3)
tests/devices/x40/device_x40_test.py (3)

3-7: LGTM! Imports are appropriate.

The imports are relevant and necessary for the tests being conducted.


10-11: LGTM! Class declaration and docstring are appropriate.

The class TestMideaX40Device is well-defined with a clear docstring.


15-29: LGTM! Setup fixture is correctly initializing the device.

The _setup_device fixture correctly sets up an instance of MideaX40Device with appropriate parameters.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e2e5704 and ff7f2bb.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/devices/x40/device_x40_test.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/devices/x40/device_x40_test.py

@rokam rokam merged commit 8f5ec79 into midea-lan:main Jul 28, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
@caibinqing caibinqing deleted the precision-halves branch July 28, 2024 16:25
@rokam rokam mentioned this pull request Jul 30, 2024
rokam added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


## [2.5.0](v2.4.0...v2.5.0)
(2024-07-30)


### Features

* **40:** add `precision_halves` customization
([#248](#248))
([8f5ec79](8f5ec79))
* **b8:** first implementation
([#225](#225))
([259e4f2](259e4f2))


### Bug Fixes

* `break` the loop when connected
([#244](#244))
([536f975](536f975))
* **ac:** correct attributes based on msg type
([#251](#251))
([fada9bc](fada9bc))
* **cloud:** fix email obfuscation
([#245](#245))
([ad9f278](ad9f278))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants